On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> ...
>
> > > Instead, I'd rather issue a warning that the swsusp header mismatches, say with
> > > which kernel the machine got suspended with and then start the countdown for reboot.
> >
> > What exactly would that change? You need to reboot anyway and fsck will run on
> > the filesystems regardless of which kernel you boot with.
>
> well, you'll have the chance to reboot with the kernel the machine got suspended
> with and then the swsusp image header _will_ match so no fsck-ing. or am i
> missing something...
Yes, you are. :-)
With the new code (which BTW I'm assuming we are talking about) the images are
not matched against the kernel they were created by, but against a hard-coded
magic number (defined in suspend_64.c) playing the role of the "header protocol
version" and against some system parameters, like the amount of RAM etc.
Since all kernels containing the new code use the same magic number, all of
them will match or none of them will match.
Of course, we may want to change the magic at some point and in that case
there you will have some non-matching kernels. If you're worried about that,
use the userland hibernation tools from suspend.sf.net (they handle such
situations quite well).
Greetings,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
