On Sat 2007-12-08 14:25:02, David P. Reed wrote:
>
>
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >0x80 should be fine for anything PC compatible anyway,
> >its specifically
> >reserved as a debug port and supported for *exactly*
> >that purpose by
> >many chipsets.
> >
> >
> Disagree. The definitions of PC compatible are quite
> problematic. I have the advantage over some of you
> young guys, in that I actually wrote code on one of the
> first 5 breadboard IBM PCs on the planet at Software
> Arts, Inc. and I was directly involved in hardware spec
> projects with the original IBM and Compaq engineers. No
> one actually defined the port numbered 80h as a
> "standard" for anything. You won't find it documented
> in any early manual for an IBM machine.
>
> The ISA bus supported unterminated transactions safely.
> That allowed some clever folks to design BIOS diagnostic
> tools that optionally plugged into the bus.
>
> In any case, my machine does not have an ISA bus. Why
> should it? It's a laptop!
There are mini-pci based cards with port 0x80 displays for notebooks.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
