On 12/09/2007 08:46 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ah. If you comment out get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() from > kernel/softlockup.c, does it start working? Yes indeed. (the process_64 part of the previous patch applied, but I think it has no effect to this issue?) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1: some issues on sparc64
- Next by Date: Re: tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52, [2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23]
- Previous by thread: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- Next by thread: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
- Index(es):
 |