[PATCH 1/3] will_become_orphaned_pgrp: we have threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



p->exit_state != 0 doesn't mean this process is dead, it may have sub-threads.

However, the new "p->exit_state && thread_group_empty(p)" check is not correct
either, this is just the temporary hack. Perhaps we can just remove this check,
but I don't understand orphaned process groups magic. At all. However, I think
exit_notify() is obviously and completely wrong wrt this helper.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

--- PT/kernel/exit.c~4_orphaned_pgrp	2007-12-06 18:06:09.000000000 +0300
+++ PT/kernel/exit.c	2007-12-07 20:25:40.000000000 +0300
@@ -219,9 +219,9 @@ static int will_become_orphaned_pgrp(str
 	int ret = 1;
 
 	do_each_pid_task(pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID, p) {
-		if (p == ignored_task
-				|| p->exit_state
-				|| is_global_init(p->real_parent))
+		if ((p == ignored_task) ||
+		    (p->exit_state && thread_group_empty(p)) ||
+		    is_global_init(p->real_parent))
 			continue;
 		if (task_pgrp(p->real_parent) != pgrp &&
 		    task_session(p->real_parent) == task_session(p)) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux