Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?

[Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>]

On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 11:43 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:32:04PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:37:57AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> > > > BTW, You may be better off using "uuidgen -t" to generate the UUID in
> > > > the smolt RPM, since that will use 12 bits of randomness from
> > > > /dev/random, plus the MAC, address and timestamp.  So even if there is
> > > > zero randomness in /dev/random, and the time is January 1, 1970, at
> > > > least the MAC will contribute some uniqueness to the UUID.
> > > 
> > > I haven't checked how uuidgen uses the MAC, but I would suggest that
> > > that is not something Fedora should jump at doing - although it would
> > > help ensure unique UUIDs, it also contributes to the tinfoil hat
> > > responses that usually come up with things like smolt.
> > 
> > Huh?  What's the concern?  All you are submitting is a list of
> > hardware devices in your system.  That's hardly anything sensitive....
> 
> Using MAC addresses -does- de-anonymize things though and presumably
> anonymous collection is a stated goal.

Right. And the more I think about it, the more I think the solution is
going to be for the smolt server to generate the UUID and tell the
client about it. Anything else seems to be based on hope, especially
when you're installing via kickstart or similar type of process.

Jon.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/