On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:07:47 +0000
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> > + mutex_lock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
> > + while (atomic_read(&nlmsvc_ref) != 0) {
>
> might be better to do the refcounting outside the thread and use the
> kthread api, which is something we still need to do for lockd anyway.
>
Currently sending a SIGKILL to lockd tells it to drop all of its locks
without exiting. If we change lockd to use kthreads, will we have to
change that to use a different mechanism?
--
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
