On Saturday 08 December 2007 03:48, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007 22:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > ah, printk_clock() still uses sched_clock(), not jiffies. So it's
> > > > not the jiffies counter that goes back and forth, it's sched_clock()
> > > > - so this is a printk timestamps anomaly, not related to jiffies. I
> > > > thought we have fixed this bug in the printk code already:
> > > > sched_clock() is a 'raw' interface that should not be used directly
> > > > - the proper interface is cpu_clock(cpu).
> > >
> > > It's a single CPU box, so sched_clock() jumping would still be
> > > problematic, no?
> >
> > sched_clock() is an internal API - the non-jumping API to be used by
> > printk is cpu_clock().
>
> You know why sched_clock jumps when the TSC frequency changes, right?
Ah, hmm, I don't know why I wrote that :)
I guess your patch is fairly complex but it should work if the plan
is to convert all sched_clock users to use cpu_clock eg like lockdep
as well.
So it looks good to me, thanks for fixing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
