Possible locking issue in viotape.c

[Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>]

Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
> I've posted all the ones I've done so far ..
> 
> ftp://source.mvista.com/pub/dwalker/sem2mutex-2.6.24-rc4/
> 
> Feel free to review or test them.. I've found it pretty easy to simply
> grep for certain class of semaphore usage, check if it's conforming to
> the mutex requirements, then convert it or not.. Checking them is
> getting to be a habit, so I don't think a list would help me.. However,
> someone else might be able to use it..
> 

Thanks, that helps me not duplicate anything.  One of the first ones I
was looking at (before your post) was viotape.c, which is in your patch
set.  However, looking at the uses of the semaphore, I see that on line
409-410 the following code:

        if (noblock)
                return count;

which seems to ignore the fact that the semaphore has been downed (not
to mention the dma buffer and op struct allocations.  I think it should be:

	if (noblock)
		ret = count;
		goto free_dma;

instead.  Do you want to make sure I'm right about that and fold it into
your patch?  Or have you already submitted your patch (or should it be
in a separate patch?  Alternatively, I can submit the patch if you don't
want to bother with it.

-- 
Kevin Winchester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/