Re: [PATCH] pid: sys_wait... fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> This modifies do_wait and eligible_child to take a pair of
> enum pid_type and struct pid *pid to precisely specify what
> set of processes are eligible to be waited for,  instead of the
> raw pid_t value from sys_wait4.

Personally, I like this patch very much. Not only it fixes the bug,
in my opinion it also makes the code more clean.

However at first glance it has a minor fixable problem,

> +	if (type < PIDTYPE_MAX) {
> +		if (p->pids[type].pid != pid)
>  			return 0;
>  	}

If type != PIDTYPE_PID we can't trust p->pids[type].pid unless p is a
group leader. This .pid could be just a "random value".

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux