On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 06:58:54PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I was just hoping somebody had a better idea, like a way to add a new
> format specifier to printk without losing gcc type checking :-)
It's been discussed before. Some of the solutions discussed:
- Add something like PRI_RES which can be concatenated into a printk.
Ugly.
- Patch gcc to allow user-definable types. I think OpenBSD has a patch
for this. Then we have to get that patch propagated to all the
people who compile the kernel. Unappetising.
- Disable gcc's printk checking, teach sparse to typecheck printk.
Most people don't run sparse yet.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
