--- David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stephen Smalley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > inode_getsecurity and getprocattr directly return the strings.
> > Admittedly, the whole interface could be cleaned up and made far more
> > consistent, but I don't think he necessarily has to go through the
> > getsecid + secid_to_secctx sequence if he only wants the secctx.
>
> It's what Daniel Walsh wanted.
Name dropper. And we don't have a convention, really. So go ahead
with key_getsecurity or key_getsecctx, as you choose. At some point
we should either change inode_getsecurity to inode_getsecctx or
secid_to_secctx to secid_to_security. Not the problem of the day.
Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
