* Gregory Haskins <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, that said, Steven's testing work on the mainline port of our
> series sums it up very nicely, so I will present that in lieu of
> digging up my -rt numbers unless you specifically want them too. Here
> they are:
i'm well aware of Steve's benchmarking efforts, but i dont think he's
finished with it and i'll let him present the results once he wants to
announce them. I asked about the effects of the "2-d" patch in isolation
and i'm not sure the numbers show that individual patch in action.
in any case, you are preaching to the choir, i wrote the first
rt-overload code and it's been in -rt forever so it's not like you need
to sell me the concept ;-) But upstream quality requirements are
different from -rt and we need to examine all aspects of scheduling, not
just latency. In any case, i'll wait for the rest of Steve's numbers.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
