[PATCH] regression: bfs endianness bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



BFS_FILEBLOCKS() expects struct bfs_inode * (on-disk data, with little-endian
fields), not struct bfs_inode_info * (in-core stuff, with host-endian ones).
It's a macro and fields with the right names are present in bfs_inode_info,
so it compiles, but on big-endian host it gives bogus results.

Introduced in commit f433dc56344cb72cc3de5ba0819021cec3aef807 (Fixes to the
BFS filesystem driver).

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/fs/bfs/inode.c b/fs/bfs/inode.c
index 294c41b..a64a71d 100644
--- a/fs/bfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/bfs/inode.c
@@ -178,7 +178,8 @@ static void bfs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	brelse(bh);
 
         if (bi->i_dsk_ino) {
-		info->si_freeb += BFS_FILEBLOCKS(bi);
+		if (bi->i_sblock)
+			info->si_freeb += bi->i_eblock + 1 - bi->i_sblock;
 		info->si_freei++;
 		clear_bit(ino, info->si_imap);
 		dump_imap("delete_inode", s);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux