> Right. The trend is to hide the nastiness of NAND technology changes > behind controllers. In general I think this is a good thing. You miss the point - any controller you hide it behind almost inevitably adds enough latency you don't want to use it synchronously. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- References:
- solid state drive access and context switching
- From: "Chris Friesen" <[email protected]>
- Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- solid state drive access and context switching
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pci: Omit error message for benign allocation failure
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/char/tty_io.c: remove pty_sem
- Previous by thread: Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- Next by thread: Re: solid state drive access and context switching
- Index(es):
 |