On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:50:21PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:02:37PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:55:02PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > cryptographically strong stream it'll provide when /dev/random is
> > > > tapped? In principle, this'd leave more entropy available for
> > > > applications that really need it, especially on platforms that don't
> > > > generate a lot of entropy in the first place (servers).
> > >
> > >
> > > As reported about a month ago, the evidence is that the /dev/random
> > > stream is not cryptographically strong. Collecting uuids generated from
> > > the kernel uuid random generator from the random generator in the kernel
> > > shows abnormal patterns of duplicates.
> >
> > Pointer, please.
>
> Alan, are you sure you're not talking about Helge Deller's attempt to
> push a Time-based UUID generator into the kernel because you can get
> duplicates from the current userspace library?
>
> I've not heard of *any* claim where the kernel uuid random generator
> has been returning duplicates.
Before we added proper locking, it could theoretically happen on SMP
with readers in lockstep. That was early 2.6.
The only serious critique I know of is the Gutterman-Pinkas-Reinman
paper which was a year out of date before publication. Now that
another year has passed, perhaps I should respond to it..
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
