Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources

On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:39 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> Can we please have them in <linux/ioport.h>? They look very useful to
> me
> elsewhere (other bus drivers, device drivers), too.
> 
> What about naming the printf format specifier macros more like in C99,
> e.g.
> PRI*?

That's a can of worms I just didn't want to open...

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cxgb - revert file mode changes.
• Next by Date: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]