[PATCH] prevent sending wrong signals to a traced process whose tracer gets killed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I experienced troubles when tracing a process with strace. Sometimes,
when I killed the strace process (SIGKILL), the traced process was also
killed. I found out that it was getting SIGTRAP and, indeed, when the
traced process set up a signal handler for SIGTRAP, it no longer died.

I noticed that normally, when the traced process is continued (via
PTRACE_CONT or similar), the signal to be sent to it is stored in
current->exit_code, which is then examined by the arch-specific code and
usually leads to something like:

                send_sig(current->exit_code, current, 1);

The exit_code is set in ptrace_stop(), but the tracing process may go
away while the traced process waits for it, and in that case exit_code
is left as-is. I think we must set it to zero in ptrace_untrace().

Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <[email protected]>

 ptrace.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff -pru a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c	2007-12-04 14:12:51.000000000 +0100
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c	2007-12-04 14:13:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void ptrace_untrace(struct task_struct *
 {
 	spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock);
 	if (child->state == TASK_TRACED) {
+		child->exit_code = 0;
 		if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED) {
 			child->state = TASK_STOPPED;
 		} else {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux