Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4

* Jie Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Simon Holm Th??gersen wrote:
>> ons, 21 11 2007 kl. 20:52 -0500, skrev Jie Chen:
>
>> There is a backport of the CFS scheduler to 2.6.21, see
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/19/127
>>
> Hi, Simon:
>
> I will try that after the thanksgiving holiday to find out whether the 
> odd behavior will show up using 2.6.21 with back ported CFS.

would be also nice to test this with 2.6.24-rc4.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above
    • From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up process_32/64.c
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] Add the word 'Warning' in check_nmi_watchdog() output
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above
• Next by thread: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]