Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*

* Joerg Roedel <[email protected]> wrote:

> +#define _PAGE_PRESENT	(_AC(1,UL)<<_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT)

please run patches through scripts/checkpatch.pl, it gives:

  total: 10 errors, 0 warnings, 42 lines checked

(please send a followup cleanup patch - i picked up your series and this 
is a minor cleanliness issue)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*
  - From: "Joerg Roedel" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] x86_64: some minor paging cleanups
  - From: "Joerg Roedel" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*
  - From: "Joerg Roedel" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]