* Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]> wrote: > > So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not? > > Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4. just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device init), not just a message, right? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- References:
- [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]>
- [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/28] blk_end_request: full I/O completion handler (take 3)
- Next by Date: Re: Stack warning from 2.6.24-rc
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected
- Index(es):
 |