Re: Is BIO_RW_FAILFAST really usable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown wrote:
I've been looking at use BIO_RW_FAILFAST in md/raid to improve
handling of some error cases.

This is particularly significant for the DASD driver (s390 specific).
I believe it uses optic fibre to connect to the drives.  When one of
these paths is unplugged, IO requests will block until an operator
runs a command to reset the card (or until it is plugged back in).
The only way to avoid this blockage is to use BIO_RW_FAILFAST.  So
we really need BIO_RW_FAILFAST for a reliable RAID1 configuration on
DASD drives.

However, I just tested BIO_RW_FAILFAST on my SATA drives: controller
02:06.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3114 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 02)

(not using the cards minimal RAID functionality) and requests fail
immediately and always with e.g.

sd 2:0:0:0: [sdc] Result: hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK
end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 2048

So fail fast obviously isn't generally usable.

What is the answer here?  Is the Silicon Image driver doing the wrong
thing, or is DASD doing the wrong thing, or is BIO_RW_FAILFAST
under-specified and we really need multiple flags or what?

It's a hard thing to implement, in general, for scalability reasons.

To make it work, you need to examine each driver's error handling to figure out what "fail fast" really means.

Most storage drivers are written to try as hard as possible to complete a request, where "try as hard as possible" can often mean internal retries while trying various multi-path configurations and hardware mode changes. You might be catching SATA in the middle of error handling, for example.

So each driver really has a /slight different/ version of "try to complete this request", which has the obvious effects on BIO_RW_FAILFAST.

No clue about DASD, but in SATA's case I bet that a media or transfer error could be returned to the system more rapidly, while we continue to try to recover in the background. libata doesn't have any direct knowledge of fail-fast at this point, IIRC.

But overall it's a job where you must examine each driver, or set of drivers :/

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux