On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:07:33PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:41:44PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > We couldn't know how much memory was allocated by kmalloc() in 2.4 era, and we can know it 2.6 era.
> > > But are we going back to 2.4 era for out-of-tree kernel modules?
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 3:57 PM, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The interesting fact is that there are zero in-kernel modules using it.
>
> Yeah, and now that we have krealloc() I don't expect that many callers
> actually need ksize() either.
Yes, most of them ought not exist.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
