hi,
> Which is a combination of two patches, which seems to have dropped the
> chunk you show below. The reason this seems to have my signoff is
> that I originated one of those patches, and parts of the second, but
> in fact I had never seen f230d3f53d72d05bcb5666ab7e2eccd49c8b3a15
> until after this email ...
I guess in my rush to get those patches submitted before leaving SAN
People I missed that chunk. Sorry.
David: The Signed-off line was kept as-is to keep the attribution correct.
> Your patch looks correct, and seems to be the only obvious chunk
> that's missing. So, I'll ack it FWIW ... usual policy for these
> patches is to go through Russell.
You can add my Ack for what it's worth.
Regards,
Andrew Victor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
