On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:50:10PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> As for the patch, it's a big NAK at this point. Vendors who can't be bothered to follow
> the standard will have to wait for Ben's separation patches before they can be supported.
> Then they can have some voodoo front-end to handle their mistakes instead of turning
> sdhci.c into a collection of hacks and workarounds.
What's the status of Ben's separation patches? I haven't seen a posting of those
versus a recent kernel. I've got some SDHCI driver glue for the non-pci Arasan core
running in an older kernel tree with those patches. It's just waiting for the separation
patches to hit the mmc or mainline tree.
-Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
