"Kay Sievers" <[email protected]> writes: > That cruft is going away with the block patch in your tree. And it doesn't matter because it is a separate mount anyway. Although I have to admit I hadn't taken that mount into account earlier. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: "rae l" <[email protected]>
- Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: "rae l" <[email protected]>
- Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- From: "Kay Sievers" <[email protected]>
- Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- Prev by Date: Re: blackfin compile error
- Next by Date: RE: 2.6.23.9, make install doesn't work with grub anymore??
- Previous by thread: Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.
- Next by thread: [bug] cops/atalk hung bootup with 2.6.23-rc4
- Index(es):
 |