On Sun, 2 December 2007 09:56:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jörn Engel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > ah. You should mark pit_read() function as notrace. PIT clocksource
> > > is rare. (add the 'notrace' word to the function prototype)
> >
> > Hardly a change at all. Apart from some offsets, this dump is
> > identical.
> >
> > stopped custom tracer.
> > BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, sh/954
> > lock: c030f280, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: sh/954, .owner_cpu: 0
> > Pid: 954, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.24-rc3-ge1cca7e8-dirty #3
> > [<c0103a04>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x35/0x54
> > [<c010450a>] show_trace+0x2c/0x2e
> > [<c0104e6d>] dump_stack+0x84/0x8a
> > [<c01ded7c>] spin_bug+0xa7/0xae
> > [<c01def14>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0xfa
> > [<c02a02b1>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x68/0x7a
> > [<c01087e2>] pit_read+0xf/0x91
> > [<c0130ee1>] get_monotonic_cycles+0xf/0x2d
> > [<c013c0e7>] now+0x2a/0x7c
> > [<c013c333>] ____trace+0x4d/0x1e8
> > [<c013dbeb>] __mcount+0x95/0xa6
> > [<c010d354>] mcount+0x14/0x18
> > [<c0135a3c>] lock_acquired+0xe/0x1d7
> > [<c02a02b9>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0x7a
> > [<c01087e2>] pit_read+0xf/0x91
>
> hm, it seems lock_acquired() [in kernel/lockdep.c] needs to be marked
> 'notrace' too - otherwise we recurse back into pit_read().
This time not even the offsets have changed. Dump is identical.
Jörn
--
Mundie uses a textbook tactic of manipulation: start with some
reasonable talk, and lead the audience to an unreasonable conclusion.
-- Bruce Perens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
