Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

Alan Cox wrote:

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:11 +0200 (EET)
Meelis Roos <[email protected]> wrote:

Can you stick a stack trace in at that point ? That would help diagnose
it a great deal quicker.

Finally done - found out hard way that BUG() is too bad and dump_st5ack() suits me better.

Thanks. This should fix the real cause, and also allow for port start to
fail politely with -ENODEV.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

applied #upstream-fixes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
    • From: Meelis Roos <[email protected]>
  • Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
    • From: Meelis Roos <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 24/28] blk_end_request: changing ide normal caller (take 3)
• Next by Date: Re: Peculiar out-of-sync boot log lines
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))
• Next by thread: Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]