Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

Alan Cox wrote:

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:11 +0200 (EET)
Meelis Roos <[email protected]> wrote:

Can you stick a stack trace in at that point ? That would help diagnose
it a great deal quicker.
Finally done - found out hard way that BUG() is too bad anddump_st5ack() suits me better.


Thanks. This should fix the real cause, and also allow for port start to
fail politely with -ENODEV.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>


applied #upstream-fixes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
  - From: Meelis Roos <[email protected]>
- Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
  - From: Meelis Roos <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 24/28] blk_end_request: changing ide normal caller (take 3)
Next by Date: Re: Peculiar out-of-sync boot log lines
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))
Next by thread: Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]