Kernel 2.6.23.9 + mdadm 2.6.2-2 + Auto rebuild RAID1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quick question,

Setup a new machine last night with two raptor 150 disks. Setup RAID1 as I do everywhere else, 0.90.03 superblocks (in order to be compatible with LILO, if you use 1.x superblocks with LILO you can't boot), and then:

/dev/sda1+sdb1 <-> /dev/md0 <-> swap
/dev/sda2+sdb2 <-> /dev/md1 <-> /boot (ext3)
/dev/sda3+sdb3 <-> /dev/md2 <-> / (xfs)

All works fine, no issues...

Quick question though, I turned off the machine, disconnected /dev/sda from the machine, boot from /dev/sdb, no problems, shows as degraded RAID1. Turn the machine off. Re-attach the first drive. When I boot my first partition either re-synced by itself or it was not degraded, was is this?

So two questions:

1) If it rebuilt by itself, how come it only rebuilt /dev/md0?
2) If it did not rebuild, is it because the kernel knows it does not need to re-calculate parity etc for swap?

I had to:

mdadm /dev/md1 -a /dev/sda2
and
mdadm /dev/md2 -a /dev/sda3

To rebuild the /boot and /, which worked fine, I am just curious though why it works like this, I figured it would be all or nothing.

More info:

Not using ANY initramfs/initrd images, everything is compiled into 1 kernel image (makes things MUCH simpler and the expected device layout etc is always the same, unlike initrd/etc).

Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux