On Friday 30 November 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > It's not an issue of accidental writes, it's an issue of there being
> > no other synchronization for setting those alarms. Remember that both
> > RTC_WKALM_SET and RTC_ALM_SET ioctls can set that same alarm, and so
> > could a different userspace activity ...
>
> We have 3 interfaces to one hardware resource. I do not think kernel
> should try to arbitrate it here. There's just one alarm clock with
> three interfaces.
Having three interfaces is bad enough ... ensuring that none of
them can ever be used safely would be stupid.
> > As written, this allows one userspace activity to clobber another if
> > it does so explicitly, by first disabling the other one and then
> > setting its own alarm. But the idea is to minimize "accidents" like
> > unintentionally clobbering an alarm set by someone else.
>
> Well, I could not get it to work with this "avoid-clobber" feature.
I had earlier pointed out a different issue, whereby "oneshot"
semantics weren't consistently followed. I've been working on
some patches to address that. The ACPI bits still need work,
but I'll forward one part soonish.
> > > If I remove "accidental alarm modify" logic, I can actually use rtc to
> > > wake up more than once per boot.
> >
> > Evidently the alarm isn't being disabled then...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's the issue addressed by those patches. (Specific to rtc-cmos,
not to RTCs on saner hardware.)
> I think we should just remove the 'avoid-clobber' logic. If userland
> wants to somehow arbitrate access, it can.
Pray tell, *HOW* could it arbitrate?
> Now, if we want to provide "nice" interface for timed sleep, I think
> we can. Actually, I'd like to use normal select() as such an
> interface,
Yeah, what ever happened to timerfd? :)
> and enable kernel to automatically detect when it can sleep
> and when it has to wake up.
There's the "rtcwake" thing. That got merged into util-linux-ng, but
I happened to notice its setup_alarm() is calling gmtime() instead
of localtime() ... my suspicion is that the uClibc version I was using
had some timezone bugs, or else there's some other bug lurking in the
vicinity of dual-bootiness.
Note that "wakealarm" is not intende to be a "timed sleep" interface
at all ... it's just to set the wakealarm. Something else is in charge
of putting the system to sleep, such as "echo mem > /sys/power/state"
or some GUI thing hooked up to logic that knows about how to make frame
buffers recover.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
