Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?

> Well, I applied the patch (in 2.6.23 it's
>  arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S,
> not
>  arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S,
> but that's minor) - still the same behavior, it still reboots
> instantly right when bootloader gave control to the kernel.
> So it must be something else.. ;)

It should be x86, they merged the i386 and x86_64 code into one arch
called x86.   Try it again and see if it works

Thanks,

- Jerry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
    • From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
    • From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4, v3] Physical PCI slot objects
• Next by Date: VMware on 2.6.34: patches to enable vmmon and vmet to build/run
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
• Next by thread: [PATCH] 2.6.24: restore missing sysfs max_cstate attr
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]