On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > such as? I guess these two: > > mm-prevent-dereferencing-non-allocated-per_cpu-variables.patch > mm-prevent-dereferencing-non-allocated-per_cpu-variables-fix.patch > > would be needed too? I sent another list in an earlier email. AFAICT the above does not matter. Early boot interactions with lockdep may be an issue if that is enabled. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 03/10] percpu: Make the asm-generic/percpu.h more "generic"
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64
- Next by thread: circular locking dependency detected
- Index(es):
 |