Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > you mean this single patch:
> > 
> >  modules-fold-percpu_modcopy-into-modulec-and-get-rid-of-the-macro-from-hell.patch
> > 
> > that's the only patch i missed AFAICS.
> 
> That is a pretty uncritical one. Then there is the fix of the zero 
> address handling in modules.c, the fixup for the use of __per_cpu_xx 
> variables in modules.c. etc.

you again talk about modules.c but my test kernel that crashes has no 
modules at all.

> It would be best to test against mm since there are core changes here 
> that will have to wait to the next merge period.

if you treat testing and review efforts like that they might have to 
wait even longer :-( "My stuff is there somewhere amongst 1415 -mm 
patches. Thank you for your interest and buzz off already."

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux