[snip]
>> + &namespaces, path, table);
>
> Hey Eric,
>
> the patches look nice.
Agree ;)
> The hand-forcing of the passed-in net_ns into a copy of current->nsproxy
> does make it seem like nsproxy may not be the best choice of what to
> pass in. Doesn't only net_sysctl_root->lookup() look at the argument?
>
> But I assume you don't want to be more general than sending in a
> nsproxy so as to dissuade abuse of this interface for needlessly complex
> sysctl interfaces?
>
> (Well I expect that'll become clear once the the patches using this
> come out.)
>
> Are you planning to use this infrastructure for the uts and ipc
> sysctls as well?
I have sent some patches concerning uts and ipc already.
I'd appreciate any feedback on it :)
> thanks,
> -serge
Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]