Re: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]

[David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>]

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> I don't like this -- it shouldn't be necessary.

Actually, I think you're right.  I think the problem is that:

        if (uaddr != MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
                /* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
                   are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
                uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
        }

Should be:

        if (uaddr == MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
                /* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
                   are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
                uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
        }

Otherwise the finfo->uaddr[] table is useless because only the first row will
be used, except for unsupported configurations where uaddr will be set to
MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED.

With the ASB2303 bootprom I need to use the second row because it's in the x16
configuration, *not* the x8.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/