On 11/30/07, Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:33:19PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> > This patch fixes s390 dependency for x86
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[email protected]>
>
> Deleting random parts of the kernel tree is actually not
> supported.
>
I agree with you. I just did this to same some space because I keep
many kernel trees.
But i am curious if other arch do not depends on x86 then s390 ?
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> > index 1330061..b699ed5 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> > @@ -537,4 +537,6 @@ source "security/Kconfig"
> >
> > source "crypto/Kconfig"
> >
> > +source "arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig"
> > +
>
> With this there's no dependency on CRYPTO_HW anymore.
>
Anyhow "if CRYPTO_HW" is not working in drivers/crypto/Kconfig
have you tested this patch on S390. Is this giving errors ?
And you can also add depends with CRYPTO_HW in arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> > #include "../arch/s390/appldata/appldata.h"
> > +#endif
>
> This include can go away.
>
> Since this pops up again and again we'll come up with a patch to fix this.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
