Re: Race between generic_forget_inode() and sync_sb_inodes()?

On 30-11-2007 00:03, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday November 30, [email protected] wrote:
...
>> Or have I just not had enough coffee this morning?
> 
> :-)  And I cannot even blame the lack of coffee as I don't drink it.
> 

Looks like logical error...

(Or I haven't had enough coffee this morning either?)

Regards,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: Race between generic_forget_inode() and sync_sb_inodes()?
  - From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: kobject_init rewrite
Next by Date: Kernel Development & Objective-C
Previous by thread: Re: Race between generic_forget_inode() and sync_sb_inodes()?
Next by thread: [PATCH] Fix forgotten module release in xt_CONNMARK and xt_CONNSECMARK
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]