Hi,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:05:13 -0700 Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The database performance group have found that half the cycles spent
> > in kmem_cache_free are spent in this one call to BUG_ON. Moving it
> > into the CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG-only function cache_free_debugcheck() is a
> > performance win of almost 0.5% on their particular benchmark.
> >
> > The call was added as part of commit ddc2e812d592457747c4367fb73edcaa8e1e49ff
> > with the comment that "overhead should be minimal". It may have been
> > minimal at the time, but it isn't now.
> >
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It is worth noting that the offending commit hit mainline in June 2006.
>
> It takes a very long time for some performance regressions to be
> discovered. By which time it is effectively too late to fix it.
What architecture is this? x86_64? I don't think the BUG_ON per se caused
the performance regression but rather the virt_to_head_page() changes to
virt_to_cache() that were added later. But reverting the BUG_ON is fine by
me.
Thanks Matthew and others for tracking this down!
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
