Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

NOTE: This patch uses a bc(1) script to compute the appropriate
constants.

Perhaps dc would be more appropriate?  That's included in busybox.

	-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
• Next by Date: Re: kondemand: kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:258!
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/Changes -> Documentation/Requirements
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]