On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:16:28PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Ok, how about this function. If it errors out, it is free to just call
> > kfree() on the kobject. Seems simple enough to me, any objections? If
> > not, I'll go through and fix up the whole tree...
>
> Looks good, _provided_ you also get rid of kobject_register(). Which
> you pretty much would have to do anyway, since it doesn't accept the
> ktype or the name as an argument.
Yes, I would do that at the same time.
Well, not at the _exact_ same time, it might take a few patches to get
there :)
thanks for the review,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
