Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:10:12 -0800
David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> I think the right thing to do there is just insist that in the RTC
> framework, alarms should always follow the one-shot model.

 /me agrees.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 06/10] s390: Use generic percpu
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH x86/mm 6/6] x86-64 ia32 ptrace get/putreg32 current task
• Previous by thread: Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
• Next by thread: Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]