Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:10:12 -0800
David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> I think the right thing to do there is just insist that in the RTC
> framework, alarms should always follow the one-shot model.

 /me agrees.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
  - From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 06/10] s390: Use generic percpu
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH x86/mm 6/6] x86-64 ia32 ptrace get/putreg32 current task
Previous by thread: Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
Next by thread: Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]