Hello Russell,
> While I realise that, I'm telling you that the _problem_ is being
> caused by the wrong handler being used.
Okay, I believe you... (someone told me once, Russell is right, and if
you do not believe him, he is still right ;-)
> SA1100 and PXA have exactly the same setup. They use the correct
> handler. Why is AT91 special?
This remark is what convinced me :-))
I changed the interrupt handler from the simple_irq to the edge_irq,
and it works...!!
(I added a noop routine for that .ack part, because there is no ack)
I believe I was too focussed on the masking bug in the RT kernel on
the simple_irq() that I did not see that for the AT91 series the edge
type interrupt handler also works... (even better...) What I thought
was 1 single bug in the RT-kernel turned out to be a number of things
together that aren't correct, even for mainline.
So, to come to a conclusion: The masking bug in RT is still there in
the simple_irq path, and masking has to be removed from the simple_irq
code. Also for mainline. AT91 can live without simple_irq.
I think we are in sync again...
I will post a patch for the AT91 later on, after some more testing.
Kind Regards,
Remy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]