Re: [patch 1/1] Writeback fix for concurrent large and small file writes

["Michael Rubin" <mrubin@google.com>]

Thank you. Integrated the fixes in my patch.

On Nov 28, 2007 6:13 PM, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
> Two typos in comments.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
>
> Michael Rubin wrote:
> > + * The flush tree organizes the dirtied_when keys with the rb_tree. Any
> > + * inodes with a duplicate dirtied_when value are link listed together.
> > This + * link list is sorted by the inode's i_flushed_when. When both the
> > + * dirited_when and the i_flushed_when are indentical the order in the
> > + * linked list determines the order we flush the inodes.
>
> s/dirited_when/dirtied_when/
>
> > + * Here is where we interate to find the next inode to process. The
> > + * strategy is to first look for any other inodes with the same
> > dirtied_when + * value. If we have already processed that node then we
> > need to find + * the next highest dirtied_when value in the tree.
>
> s/interate/iterate/
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/