Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:33:28 +0900 (JST)
[email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:

> > +static inline struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
> > +mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid)
> > +{
> > +	if (!mem->info.nodeinfo[nid])
> 
> can this be true?
> 
> YAMAMOTO Takashi

When I set early_init=1, I added that check.
BUG_ON() is better ?

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
    • From: [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi)

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix static rate if path faster than link
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
• Next by thread: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [4/10] calculate mapper_ratio per cgroup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]