On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:24:06 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:37:02 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maybe zonelists of NODE_DATA() is not initialized. you are right. > > I think N_HIGH_MEMORY will be suitable here...(I'll consider node-hotplug case later.) > > > > Thank you for test! > > > Could you try this ? > Sorry..this can be a workaround but I noticed I miss something.. ok, just use N_HIGH_MEMORY here and add comment for hotplugging support is not yet. Christoph-san, Lee-san, could you confirm following ? - when SLAB is used, kmalloc_node() against offline node will success. - when SLUB is used, kmalloc_node() against offline node will panic. Then, the caller should take care that node is online before kmalloc(). Regards, -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [0/10] introduction
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- From: Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [0/10] introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] (2.4.26-rc3-mm2) -mm Update CAP_LAST_CAP to reflect CAP_MAC_ADMIN
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
- Index(es):
 |