On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:20:46 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 27 2007 23:33, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >It didn't work too well. The first result was one of maximal
> >embarrassment: I produced a patch that didn't even compile when
> >applied to the official tree. This shouldn't happen with git, right?
> >Well, it did. So now I'm back to keeping a virgin kernel source tree
> >alongside my development area in order to produce diffs. That can't
> >be right?
> >
> No, it can't. Use stgit/quilt ;p
No, use "git rebase --interactive" ;-)
I've tried stgit/guilt/quilt as well, but I could never quite get the
hang of it (adding the files _before_ editing is the difficult part.) On
the other hand, git rebase --interactive fit right into my workflow and
improved it massively.
But I guess it's all a matter of personal preference.
Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
