Re: git guidance

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> By that definition, no SCM, not even CVS, is transparent.  Nothing short
> of unpacked directories of all versions (wasting a lot of disk space)
> would.

Who said anything about unpacking?

I'm talking about GIT transparently serving a Virtual Version Control dir to 
be mounted on the client.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Jakub Narebski <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] kmemcheck: trap uses of uninitialized memory (v2)
• Previous by thread: Re: git guidance
• Next by thread: Re: git guidance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]