Re: git guidance — Linux Kernel

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> By that definition, no SCM, not even CVS, is transparent.  Nothing short
> of unpacked directories of all versions (wasting a lot of disk space)
> would.

Who said anything about unpacking?

I'm talking about GIT transparently serving a Virtual Version Control dir to 
be mounted on the client.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: git guidance
  - From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
  - From: Jakub Narebski <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: git guidance
  - From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
  - From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
  - From: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] kmemcheck: trap uses of uninitialized memory (v2)
Previous by thread: Re: git guidance
Next by thread: Re: git guidance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]