Dave Quigley schrieb: > There is a project listed on the kernel.org git page called guilt. I > find it very useful. It is much more responsive than stgit and it > actually has a git backend which quilt does not. > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 00:20 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Nov 27 2007 23:33, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> > >> >Well, it did. So now I'm back to keeping a virgin kernel source tree >> >alongside my development area in order to produce diffs. That can't >> >be right? >> > >> No, it can't. Use stgit/quilt ;p In which respect would stgit/quilt/guilt help me? At first glance they just seem to add another level of complexity. Thanks, Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Yes, I have searched Google!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: git guidance
- From: Dave Quigley <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- References:
- git guidance
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- From: Dave Quigley <[email protected]>
- git guidance
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] New kobject/kset/ktype documentation and example code
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] New kobject/kset/ktype documentation and example code
- Previous by thread: Re: git guidance
- Next by thread: Re: git guidance
- Index(es):
 |