Re: [uml-devel] leak in do_ubd_request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:37:53AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Do we have any idea which patch this patch fixes?
> 
> I seems like a mainline bug, and has been present for some time
> (forever?).
> 
> I have no idea why this wasn't noticed earlier.

Not forever, but it's been there for a while - it was introduced here:

commit 2adcec2197897365e0a0f657f1098cbfdb44bc8b
Author: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun May 6 14:51:37 2007 -0700

    uml: send pointers instead of structures to I/O thread
    
    Instead of writing entire structures between UML and the I/O thread, we send
    pointers.  This cuts down on the amount of data being copied and possibly
    allows more requests to be pending between the two.
    
    This requires that the requests be kmalloced and freed instead of living on
    the stack.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
    Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux