Hello Kevin,
Just copied your mail to the list, maybe your solution is also worth looking at.
Remy
> I had a similar issue when using the chained GPIO interrupts on OMAP
> under PREEMPT_RT.
>
> I believe the chained handler itself is supposed to be doing the
> ack/unmask instead of the simple_handler.
>
> However, currently there is no way for the chained handler to know
> when the threaded handler has acutally run. So the way I fixed this
> was to have the simple handler call the chip->end hook so that the
> chained handler could do the ack/unmask after the threaded handler has
> actually run.
>
> I've been using this against the -rt patch since 2.6.21, and submitted
> and RFC a while back, but got no comments.
>
> This patch is against 2.6.24-rc2-rt1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index b35d209..2f9e09e 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,8 @@ static void thread_simple_irq(irq_desc_t *desc)
> note_interrupt(irq, desc, action_ret);
> }
> desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
> + if (desc->chip->end)
> + desc->chip->end(irq);
> }
>
> /*
>
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
