On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:22:56 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > The prefetch however might still need some work - we can indeed do
> > prefetch() against a not-possible CPU's memory here. And I do recall that
> > 4-5 years ago we did have a CPU (one of mine, iirc) which would oops when
> > prefetching from a bad address. I forget what the conclusion was on that
> > matter.
> >
> > If we do want to fix the prefetch-from-outer-space then we should be using
> > cpu_isset(cpu, *cpumask) here rather than cpu_possible().
>
> Generally the prefetch things have turned out to be not that useful. How
> about dropping the prefetch? I kept it because it was there.
I don't recall anyone ever demonstrating that prefetch is useful in-kernel.
I think I've heard of situations where benefits have been seen in userspace
- if a loop does a lot of calculation on each datum which it fetches then
there's a good opportunity to pipeline the fetch with the on-core
crunching. But kernel doesn't do that sort of thing..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]